Projects
Energy

Comprehensive Environmental & CFD Analysis Mixed-Use Residential and Commercial Development in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Project Overview

Project Location:

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Climate Zone:
Hot-Arid Desert Climate
Project Year:
2025
Project Type:
Environmental & CFD Analysis
3D Modeling in DesignBuilder:
Eng. Madihe Moradnia | Rymast Studio
Energy Simulation and Optimization Specialist: ​
Dr. Amirhossein Janzadeh | Rymast Studio
Software Used:
Analysis Scope:

Project Introduction

This project presents a comprehensive environmental performance assessment and Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) analysis for a large-scale mixed-use development located in Riyadh. The development includes high-rise residential towers, mid-rise residential wings, commercial podiums, landscaped terraces, rooftop gardens, and interconnected pedestrian zones.

The study investigates climatic behavior, wind dynamics, façade pressure distribution, pedestrian-level comfort, daylight availability, and photovoltaic(PV) performance using advanced environmental simulation tools and validated meteorological datasets.
The primary objective of the analysis is to optimize environmental performance, improve outdoor and indoor comfort, reduce operational energy demand, and support climate-responsive architectural design strategies suitable for hot-arid environments.

Image Jul 3 2026 04 32 58 PM - Rymast Architecture Studio

Phase 01; Wind Climate Analysis & Environmental Assessment

The Importance of Climate Analysis in Architectural Design

Understanding wind behavior and climatic conditions is essential for sustainable architectural design in desert environments. In Riyadh’s hot-arid climate, wind patterns directly influence thermal comfort, passive cooling potential, urban ventilation, façade performance, and energy consumption.
This phase evaluates annual and seasonal wind behavior using validated meteorological data and environmental visualization tools.

02 - Rymast Architecture Studio

Analysis Objectives

The primary objectives of the climate analysis include;

  • Evaluating annual and seasonal wind behavior
  • Identifying prevailing wind directions
  • Assessing wind-speed fluctuations throughout the year
  • Analyzing the relationship between wind and ambient temperature
  • Evaluating passive cooling potential
  • Developing climate-responsive architectural strategies
Image Jul 8 2026 12 24 32 AM - Rymast Architecture Studio
Image Jul 8 2026 12 27 19 AM - Rymast Architecture Studio

Methodology

The climatic analysis was conducted using IWEC EPW weather data processed through Climate Consultant 6.0 and cross-verified with Meteonorm and NOAA climate databases.

The following environmental parameters were evaluated;

  • Wind speed and direction
  • Relative humidity
  • Dry bulb temperature
  • Thermal comfort conditions
  • Psychrometric behavior
  • Seasonal climatic variations
Image Jul 8 2026 12 31 46 AM - Rymast Architecture Studio
Image Jul 8 2026 12 35 24 AM - Rymast Architecture Studio

Key Findings

Prevailing Wind Patterns;

The analysis demonstrates that northwestern and northern winds dominate throughout most of the year, particularly during spring and autumn seasons.
Spring months exhibit the highest wind velocities, creating favorable conditions for passive ventilation strategies. Conversely, summer periods experience weaker airflow combined with extremely high temperatures, significantly reducing the effectiveness of natural ventilation.

05 - Rymast Architecture Studio

Thermal Comfort Assessment;

The psychrometric analysis indicates that less than 10% of annual hours fall within the thermal comfort zone without mechanical cooling systems.

The following passive strategies were identified as highly effective:

  • Night flush cooling
  • Thermal mass integration
  • Evaporative cooling
  • Cross ventilation
  • Shaded outdoor environments

Mechanical cooling remains indispensable during peak summer periods.

06 - Rymast Architecture Studio

Temperature & Humidity Analysis;

The environmental dataset reveals;

  • Average annual dry bulb temperature: ~28.6°C
  • Maximum recorded temperature: ~47°C
  • Minimum recorded temperature: ~5°C
  • Average annual relative humidity: ~29%

Low humidity levels create strong potential for evaporative cooling applications during transitional seasons.

07 - Rymast Architecture Studio

Architectural Implications

The climatic findings directly inform several architectural design decisions;

  • Building orientation should prioritize northwest-facing openings.
  • Eastern façades require enhanced solar protection and insulation.
  • Courtyard geometries can improve airflow acceleration.
  • Roof ventilation shafts and stack ventilation systems are highly recommended.
  • Dust filtration strategies are necessary during spring dust events.
08 1 - Rymast Architecture Studio
08 2 - Rymast Architecture Studio
08 3 - Rymast Architecture Studio
08 4 - Rymast Architecture Studio

Phase 02; CFD Simulation of Site-Wide Airflow

CFD Analysis Objective

This phase investigates airflow behavior across the entire mixed-use development using high-resolution CFD simulations. The study evaluates aerodynamic interactions between towers, podiums, terraces, courtyards, and urban circulation spaces.

Objectives:

The CFD simulation aims to:

  • Analyze wind movement throughout the site
  • Identify airflow corridors and stagnation zones
  • Evaluate pedestrian-level wind behavior
  • Investigate turbulence and vortex formation
  • Assess natural ventilation potential
  • Improve environmental performance through aerodynamic optimization

Simulation Framework:

  • The CFD simulations were conducted using DesignBuilder CFD with ANSYS Fluent as the solver engine.
  • Simulation Parameters;
    • ANSYS Fluent Simulation
    • Standard k–ε Turbulence
    • Model
      Inlet Wind Velocity: 5 m/s
    • Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Entire Site
09 - Rymast Architecture Studio

Key Findings

  1. Wind Corridors;

    The arrangement of mid-rise wings creates natural airflow corridors aligned with prevailing northwestern winds. These corridors significantly enhance cross-ventilation throughout the site.

  2. Venturi Acceleration;

    Velocity amplification zones were identified between towers and podium structures, where wind speeds increased up to 1.7 times the ambient flow velocity. These areas require careful pedestrian-level mitigation strategies.

  3. Recirculation Zones;

    CFD streamlines reveal vortex formation behind podium masses and within recessed courtyards, particularly during low-wind conditions. These zones may negatively affect outdoor thermal comfort and air quality.

  4. Vertical Wind Shear;

    At elevations above 60 meters, airflow becomes stratified and turbulent, reducing the effectiveness of passive stack ventilation systems.

10 - Rymast Architecture Studio

Architectural Implications

Positive Performance Characteristics;

  • Enhanced cross ventilation
  • Improved passive cooling potential
  • Effective airflow through stepped massing
  • Beneficial urban permeability

Critical Challenges;

  • Turbulence near tower edges
  • High-speed pedestrian wind zones
  • Pressure accumulation at podium interfaces
  • Downdraft effects near tall façades
placeholder - Rymast Architecture Studio

Phase 03; Wind Pressure Distribution on Building Facades

Study Objective

This phase evaluates wind-induced pressure behavior on vertical and horizontal building surfaces to optimize façade engineering, structural detailing, and envelope performance.

The study investigates;

  • Positive and negative pressure zones
  • Pressure coefficient distribution (Cp)
  • Façade uplift risks
  • Structural implications of aerodynamic loading
  • Curtain wall performance under wind stress

Key Findings

Windward Pressure Zones;
The northwestern façades experienced the highest positive pressure values, with Cp values reaching approximately +0.78 at upper tower levels.

Leeward Suction Zones;
Negative pressure values between -0.40 and -0.55 were observed on southeastern façades, creating significant suction and uplift risks.

Dynamic Pressure Effects;
Pressure fluctuations near corners and podium edges generated localized turbulence and façade stress concentrations.

Structural & Envelope Recommendations

  • Reinforce façade anchoring systems
  • Use structurally supported vertical shading fins
  • Limit operable openings in high-pressure zones
  • Avoid lightweight rooftop materials in uplift areas
  • Increase structural stiffness near tower corners
11 - Rymast Architecture Studio

Phase 04; Pedestrian Wind Comfort & Outdoor Microclimate

Study Objective:

This phase assesses outdoor thermal and aerodynamic comfort conditions at pedestrian height using Lawson Comfort Criteria and Beaufort classifications.

Key Findings:

  • Comfortable Zones;
    Northwestern plazas and shaded public spaces demonstrated comfortable wind conditions suitable for seating, gathering, and outdoor activities.

  • High-Velocity Zones;
    Eastern walkways and rooftop terraces experienced elevated wind speeds exceeding acceptable comfort thresholds during seasonal wind events.

  • Courtyard Performance;
    Most internal courtyards benefited from wind protection; however, localized vortex formation occurred in corner zones.

  • Design Recommendations;
    • Integrate vegetation buffers and windbreaks
    • Utilize pergolas and semi-open shading systems
    • Position seating areas within wind-shadow zones
    • Use recessed entrances for retail and commercial functions
    • Install aerodynamic landscape elements
12 - Rymast Architecture Studio

Phase 05; Structural Wind Load Implications

Importance of the Analysis

In high-rise buildings, wind-induced forces have a direct impact on the following;

  • Structural stability
  • Vibration response
  • Occupant comfort
  • Façade design

Key Findings

Windward Pressure Zones;
The northwestern façades experienced the highest positive pressure values, with Cp values reaching approximately +0.78 at upper tower levels.

Leeward Suction Zones;
Negative pressure values between -0.40 and -0.55 were observed on southeastern façades, creating significant suction and uplift risks.

Dynamic Pressure Effects;
Pressure fluctuations near corners and podium edges generated localized turbulence and façade stress concentrations.

Structural & Envelope Recommendations

  • Reinforce façade anchoring systems
  • Use structurally supported vertical shading fins
  • Limit operable openings in high-pressure zones
  • Avoid lightweight rooftop materials in uplift areas
  • Increase structural stiffness near tower corners
13 - Rymast Architecture Studio

Phase 06; Daylight, Solar & Photovoltaic Performance Analysis

Daylight Analysis

This phase evaluates daylight penetration, seasonal shadow behavior, solar exposure, and photovoltaic performance throughout the development.

Daylight Analysis Objectives:

  • Improve visual comfort
  • Reduce artificial lighting demand
  • Optimize passive solar performance
  • Analyze seasonal shadow casting behavior

Analysis Periods:

The behavior of solar shading and daylight was evaluated across the four seasons.

  • Summer Solstice
  • Winter Solstice
  • Spring Equinox
  • Autumn Equinox

Results:

  • Summer; Extensive shading reduced the building’s cooling load.
  • Winter; Increased daylight penetration improved the potential for passive solar heating.
14 1 - Rymast Architecture Studio
14 2 - Rymast Architecture Studio
14 3 - Rymast Architecture Studio
14 4 - Rymast Architecture Studio

Photovoltaic(PV) Assessment

Objective:

Evaluate the performance of photovoltaic(PV) panels installed on the building façade and roof.

Results:

  • Highest efficiency was achieved on the roof.
  • Good performance was observed on the southeast- and southwest-facing façades.
  • Potential to supply a portion of the building’s energy demand.
Image Jul 8 2026 12 39 46 AM - Rymast Architecture Studio
Image Jul 8 2026 12 57 01 AM - Rymast Architecture Studio
15 3 Image Jul 10 2026 10 31 32 AM - Rymast Architecture Studio
15 4 Image Jul 8 2026 10 23 18 PM - Rymast Architecture Studio

Final Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrate that design informed by CFD analysis and climatic data can play a significant role in advancing sustainable architecture in hot-arid climates.
The integration of climate-responsive design, natural ventilation, wind pressure control, daylight optimization, and solar energy utilization contributes to reduced energy consumption, improved occupant comfort, and enhanced urban environmental quality.


For professional consultation and energy management services tailored to your projects, please contact our team.

در صورت داشتن هرگونه سوال، با ما در تماس باشید …